TL;DR: The Supreme Court has cracked down on the controversial practice of ābulldozer justiceā, declaring it illegal and a violation of fundamental rights. The verdict sets strict guidelines for property demolitions, ensuring due process and accountability. This comes in the backdrop of multiple demolitions targeting marginalized communities, especially Muslims. šāļø
šØ Bulldozer Justice: Justice or Vendetta?
In a landmark decision, the Supreme CourtĀ has called out the practice of arbitrary demolitionsĀ as a threat to the rule of law. The apex court laid down rules to curb this practice:
Prior Notice: No demolition without giving individuals time to respond. šØ
Limited Scope: Only unauthorized structures, as identified, can be demolished swiftly. šļø
Accountability: Officials violating these rules could face compensation recoveryĀ or contempt proceedings. š¼ā ļø
This verdict reinforces Article 21Ā of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and shelter. šŖš½š
šļø The Bigger Picture: Politics & Bulldozers
The courtās judgment lands amidst rising concerns about the politicization of demolitions. Reports, including one by Amnesty International, reveal that from April to June 2022, 128 structuresāmostly belonging to Muslimsāwere bulldozed in five states, four of which are BJP-ruled. šš
States like Uttar PradeshĀ have earned the nickname ābulldozer stateā, as authorities use demolitions not only for illegal encroachments but also as punitive actions against alleged offenders, often bypassing legal protocols. ššØ
āļø Why This Verdict Matters
The judgment serves as a powerful reminder:
Separation of Powers: The executiveĀ cannot assume the roles of judge, jury, and executioner. šš©āāļø
Due Process: Arbitrary actions undermine democratic principlesĀ and fuel social injustice.
Human Dignity: The right to shelter is integral to living a dignified life. š”šļø
The Supreme Courtās intervention ensures that no governmentĀ can bypass constitutional safeguardsĀ for political gains. šš«
šļø What About the Victims?
While the BJP welcomed the judgment, victims of past demolitionsāmany of whom lost their homes and livelihoodsāare still waiting for justice and compensation. šš¼ The courtās stance highlights the urgent need to address their grievances and rebuild trust in governance.
Will the states act swiftly to compensate these families?Ā Only time will tell. ā³
š³ļø Political Fallout
For the Opposition, this verdict is political gold. Expect heavy criticism of the BJPās governance model, especially in election campaigns. Meanwhile, the BJP might downplay the decision but cannot ignore its implications. š£ļøš³ļø
š¬ What do you think about the Supreme Courtās verdict? Should the government compensate the victims immediately? Share your thoughts below! š