top of page
MediaFx

Jaishankar Slams UN as 'Outdated Company' šŸ˜± | Is the UN Losing Its Power?

TLDR:Ā Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar criticizes the United Nations, calling it an "old company" not keeping up with modern times. He questions the UNā€™s passive role in handling global conflicts and urges the need for reforms. Jaishankar pointed out that while major initiatives are being launched outside the UN, the organization itself is increasingly sidelined. Is it time for the UN to reform? šŸ‘€


šŸ—£ļø S. Jaishankar, India's Foreign Minister, just dropped some serious truth bombs on the United Nations (UN) šŸ”„.Ā While speaking at the Kautilya Economic Conclave in Delhi, he compared the UN to an "old company" that is no longer in tune with current global dynamics šŸŒ. Jaishankar bluntly questioned the organizationā€™s role, especially with two major global conflicts currently raging on āš”ļø. His words have stirred quite a debate online šŸ’¬.

šŸ“‰ Jaishankar didnā€™t hold back, calling out the UN for its lack of action in recent crises like Covid-19 and ongoing international conflicts.Ā He pointed out that the world has changed since the UN was founded in 1945, but the organization has failed to keep up šŸ“…. Originally starting with 50 member countries, the UN now has almost four times that number, yet its influence seems to be shrinking šŸ’¼.

šŸ’¬ Jaishankar shared that countries are now looking for new ways to solve global problems outside the UN, giving examples like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), QUAD in the Indo-Pacific, and other collaborations that didnā€™t rely on the UN framework. He added that these initiatives prove that the UN is no longer the only "multilateral game in town" šŸŽÆ.

šŸ›‘ The minister was especially harsh on how the UN has handled recent conflicts, saying, ā€œNow, you have two conflicts going on in the world today, two very serious conflicts; where is the UN on them? Essentially a bystander.ā€Ā Ouch! šŸ˜¬ This hits hard considering the UN is supposed to be the primary body to maintain international peace āœŒļø.

šŸ‘„ Jaishankar also pointed out the stubbornness of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, who hold veto power and often block much-needed reforms šŸ”. He said that these countriesā€”Russia, the UK, China, France, and the USā€”are hindering progress within the UN, making it difficult for the organization to adapt to the 21st century šŸ“….

šŸšØ For years, India has been advocating for reforms in the UNā€”particularly in the Security Councilā€”so that it reflects the current world order. Many believe that the veto power held by these five countries creates an imbalance, making it harder for other nations to have a meaningful say in global decisions šŸ—³ļø.

šŸ•µļøā€ā™€ļø Critics of the UN agree with Jaishankar, pointing out that the UN needs to step up its game if it wants to stay relevant. The world has changed significantly since its formation, and newer issues like climate change šŸŒ, cyber warfare šŸ’», and global pandemics šŸ¦  require fresh approaches and quicker action.

MediaFx Opinion:Ā šŸ˜• Jaishankarā€™s comments may have sparked some conversation, but we feel that it was unnecessary to demean the UN like that. India has always stood for the strengthening of international institutions like the UN šŸ•Šļø. Instead of harshly criticizing the organization, Jaishankar could have pointed out the weak areas and suggested practical solutions šŸ¤”. In todayā€™s world, where big powers like the USA often sideline the UN, India should have spoken out against the veto power of a few nations šŸ™…ā€ā™‚ļø. In a true democratic system, every country should have an equal vote to ensure fairness and cooperation šŸ¤.

bottom of page